SAMSHA LogoThe National GAINS Center
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abouse and Mental Health Services Administration
Site Index   |  Search  

Dispelling the Myths about Sharing Data between
Mental Health and Criminal Justice Systems

John Petrila, J.D., LL.M.
Professor, University of South Florida
petrila@fmhi.usf.edu

November 13, 2006
TAPA Easy Access Net Teleconference

“Privacy” Foils Police
* Man assaulted wife, tried to burn down house
* Checked into hospital
* Police serve arrest warrant
* Hospital will not acknowledge suspect is a patient
* Hospital: “I don’t think we’re trying to be antagonistic toward law enforcement”

HIPAA Law Handcuffs Hospitals and Police
* “Area police agencies said the federal privacy laws have led to potentially dangerous people being released without their knowledge”
* Police “…agreed that hospital staff members are just following the new rules”

Fact or Myth?
* What does HIPAA really say?
* “…a covered entity may disclose protected health information in response to a law enforcement official’s request…for the purpose of identifying or locating a suspect, fugitive, material witness, or missing person…”
* Section 164.512(f)(2)(i)

The ACLU
* Question: Can the police get my medical information without a warrant?
* Answer: “Yes”

The Power of Myth
* HIPAA is the most misunderstood law in the country
* It presents no barrier to cross-systems collaboration
* It has become a major barrier to cross-systems collaboration

The Big Myths
* Myth 1: HIPAA applies to everyone
* Myth 2: All disclosures require consent
* Myth 3: No one has access without consent
* Myth 4: HIPAA eliminates state laws on confidentiality

More Big Myths
* Myth 5: Even staff from the same agency cannot share information
* Myth 6: I should not write anything down, because my client will see it
* Myth 7: If I violate HIPAA I will be severely punished, perhaps even executed
* Myth 8: Cross-systems collaboration is a great idea, too bad HIPAA makes it impossible

Today’s Presentation
* What is covered?
* Who is covered?
* What exceptions exist?
* A note on the security regulations

Applicable Laws
* Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
* Federal regulations on substance abuse treatment (42 CFR)
* State statutes
* State court decisions

HIPAA
* Portability of insurance
* Privacy
* National standards for electronic security
* State law applies if more protective of privacy than HIPAA

What Is Covered?

Protected Health Information
* Any oral or recorded information relating to
* the past, present, or future physical or mental health of an individual;
* the provision of health care to the individual;
* or payment for health care

PHI Must Be “Individually Identifiable”
* a subset of “health information,” including demographic information
* (1) that is created or received by a covered entity
* (2) that relates to the person’s condition; treatment; or payment for care;
* (3) that identifies the individual, or might reasonably be used to identify the individual.

Exception for Psychotherapy Notes
* Notes in any medium documenting or analyzing the contents of a conversation during a private counseling session
* Requires specific patient authorization to disclose
* Payment cannot be denied for non-disclosure

42 CFR 2.11
* Records: Any information whether recorded or not relating to a patient received or acquired by the program
* Any information identifying a patient as alcohol or drug abuser, obtained by program for diagnosis, referral, or treatment

Who Does HIPAA Cover?
* Health plans
* Health care clearinghouses
* Health care providers who transmit health information in electronic form

Who Is Not Covered?
* The police
* Accrediting agencies
* The courts
* Jails

Police
* May have access
* To identify or locate a suspect, fugitive, witness, or missing person
* When crime committed on premises of a covered entity
* In medical emergencies in connection with a crime
* Police may also identify injured parties

Courts and Judicial Officers
* Courts are not covered entities
* Prosecuting attorneys and defense attorneys are not covered entities
* “Standing orders” are recommended

Jails/Correctional Facilities
* Jails are usually not covered entities
* Health care provider to the jail may be a covered entity
* Special rules exist regarding PHI and correctional facilities

Does HIPAA Require Consent for Standard Releases?
• Consent is not necessary for
• Treatment (including for after-care)
• Payment
• Health care operations
• 42 CFR permits intra-program exchange and disclosures to qualified service organizations
• 42 CFR requires written consent for most disclosures
• State law may be more protective than HIPAA

May An Individual Ever Object?
* Facility directories (no specific medical information maintained)
* Notification of family, relative, friend
* In event of emergency, or incapacity of person, best professional judgment rule applies (164.510)

Are Other Disclosures Permitted? (164.512)
* In general, HIPAA permits broad disclosure
* Principle of “minimum necessity”
* 42 CFR has a similar principle (information required to carry out the purpose of disclosure)

Permitted Disclosure: Public Health Activities
* Disclosure of PHI permitted to enable public health activities such as
* Disease prevention and control
* Child abuse or neglect (state law and federal substance use law also permits)
* To investigate work-related injury (with notice to employee)
* 42 CFR permits disclosure of cause of death

Permitted Disclosure: Victims of abuse or neglect
* If reasonable belief that person is victim of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence
* Individual either agrees, or
* State law permits, and covered entity believes necessary to prevent serious harm to individual or others, or
* Person lacks capacity and law enforcement represents PHI required for “immediate enforcement activity”

Permitted Disclosure: Judicial/Administrative Proceedings
* PHI may be disclosed in response to
* Judicial order
* Subpoena without court order in some circumstances
* 42 CFR requires court order
* In general state law will require court order

Permitted Disclosure: Law Enforcement
* Court order/grand jury subpoena/administrative summons
* Information sought is relevant and material
* Request is specific and limited in scope
* De-identified information not reasonable
* 42 CFR is more restrictive

Permitted Disclosure: Law Enforcement (cont)
* For identification and location
* Information about victims of a crime
* Individual agrees to disclosure or
* Individual lacks capacity and
* Law enforcement requests info necessary to determine whether law has been violated (but not by victim)
* Info won’t be used against the victim
* Covered entity determines is in victim’s best interest
* No comparable provision in 42 CFR

Permitted Disclosure: Threat to Health or Safety
* If necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the health or safety of individual or public
* To a person able to prevent the threat, including the victim
* Is necessary for law enforcement to apprehend the person
* Most state laws makes disclosure discretionary
* To protect an identified potential victim
* No liability as long as good faith and no gross negligence

Permitted Disclosure: Court-Ordered Exams
* Courts are not covered entities
* Payment from the court is not a HIPAA transaction
* An “assessment” is “treatment” within HIPAA
* If the examiner is covered by HIPAA, the exam is covered by HIPAA (see hybrid entity exception)
* Courts can use standard language in order to compel disclosure
* State laws typically permit

Permitted Disclosures: Correctional Facilities
* PHI can be disclosed without consent to provide health care to the inmate, or for the health and safety of other inmates or correctional officials (HIPAA)
* If the person is released, e.g. on parole, then HIPAA rules apply
* No similar provision in 42 CFR

Individual Right of Access
* Key provision, designed for accuracy
* Must allow inspection or copy in form requested within 30 days of request (30 day extension permitted; 60 days if not on-site)
* HIPAA has appeals processes

May Deny Access
* Psychotherapy notes
* Information compiled in anticipation of legal proceeding
* Inmate request, if harm may occur
* Research-related information until end of research
* If a 3rd party (not a health care provider) gave information on promise of confidentiality

May Deny Access with Opportunity for Review
* If reasonably likely access would cause harm to the individual or others
* Requested information refers to a 3rd party who may be endangered
* Request is by a personal representative and disclosure would be reasonably likely to cause harm

Will I Go To Jail?
* Primary enforcement by the Office of Civil Rights of HHS
* No private cause of action
* Penalties
* Civil: $100 per violation / $25,000 per year
* Criminal: $50,000 and up to one year (false pretenses double the fine/up to five years)
* There is no bite here, and barely a bark
* 17,000 complaints
* No enforcement to date
* DOJ has ruled that only covered entities are criminally liable

Multi-System Tools
* Uniform consent form
* Business Associate Agreements
* Patient Safety Organizations
* Standard Judicial Orders

Uniform Consent Form
* Essential tool
* Individual consents to use within a treatment system
* All providers are on the form
* Other requirements may be met as well

Business Associate Agreements
* Used for those providing ancillary services to a covered entity
* 42 CFR permits qualified service organization agreements

Patient Safety Organization
* Permits DHHS Secretary to certify these organizations
* Designed to permit privileged exchange of information within the PSO
* Relevant information includes
* Efforts to improve patient safety and quality
* Collection and analysis of patient safety work product
* Development and dissemination of patient safety information, e.g. protocols, best practices, etc
* Use of such information to encourage “a culture of safety and of providing feedback and assistance to effectively minimize patient risk”
* Public Law 109-41, Section 921-925.

Standard Judicial Order
* Courts are not covered entities
* Courts may seek PHI
* Best solution is a standard order

The Security Regulation
An electronic system is “interconnected set[s] of information resources under the same direct management control that share common functionality. A system normally includes hardware, software, information, data, applications, communications and people." (45 CFR 164.304)

Exemptions include
* Paper to paper faxes
* Voice mails
* Video conferencing

Requirements (164.308)
* Security management
* Assigned security responsibility
* Workforce security
* Information access management
* Security awareness and training
* Security incident procedures
* Contingency plan
* Evaluation

Fact or Myth?
* Myth 1: HIPAA applies to everyone
* Myth 2: All disclosures require consent
* Myth 3: No one has access without consent
* Myth 4: HIPAA eliminates state laws on confidentiality

Fact or Myth?
* Myth 5: Even staff from the same agency cannot share information
* Myth 6: I should not write anything down, because my client will see it
* Myth 7: If I violate HIPAA I will be severely punished, perhaps even executed
* Myth 8: Cross-systems collaboration is a great idea, too bad HIPAA makes it impossible

Summary
* HIPAA, state law, and federal regulations on substance use confidentiality are more similar than not
* HIPAA does not block all exchanges of information
* The principle of “minimal necessity” is critical
* In a conflict, the most protective law applies
* Inter-system sharing of information is possible

Some Useful Sites
* www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/ (Office of Civil Rights FAQs)
* http://hipaablog.blogspot.com/ (news stories about HIPAA)
* www.hipaa.samhsa.gov/download2/SAMHSAHIPAAComparisonClearedPDFVersion.pdf (comparison of HIPAA and 42 CFR)
* http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-12/800-12-html/index.html (introduction to security regulations)
* www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jc/documents/reports/0405itema12.pdf (information on standard court orders in California Probate Court)
* www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/CS_PriPubHIPPA96Pub.pdf (analysis of HIPAA and the courts, including a standing judicial order)

Gains@prainc.com The CMHS National GAINS Center GainsTAPA@prainc.com
800.311.GAIN   866.518.TAPA

Funded by the Center for Mental Health Services of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
< Privacy Policy >

For Alternative Access to Web Documents : Email gains@prainc.com

USA.gov Logo
USA.gov is the U.S. government's official web portal to all federal, state and local government web resources and services.
View our events calendarAbout the centerPrograms databaseResourcesTrainings and technical assistance
Printed from gainscenter.samhsa.gov: